August 09, 2003
I've argued here, there and everywhere, that brands are just ideas with names on.
It's the economical packaging of these great ideas that enables them to propagate so well.
'Christianity'. 'Nike'. 'Outsourcing'. 'Coke'. 'Communism'. 'America'.
These were great first generation brands.
But that same elegant slipperiness from one brain to the next is also what makes these ideas so vulnerable in this new democratised generation. Because you can't really get hold of them, you can't change them or mould them. They are closed to their stakeholders. We can't make them relevant. They are, by definition unsustainable brands. They cannot learn.
So what does beyond branding imply for brands? That they invert!
Instead of being ideas with names on...you guessed it...they must become names with ideas on.
Spiky, engaging, uncomfortable, confrontational. BB superbrands will wear their knickers on the outside.
We are seeking nominations for some potential BB superbrands - brands with high learning opportunities?
All that remains is for these brands to turn potential into reality... permalink
Comments: Post a CommentLinks to this post
Links to this post:
Authors and associates individual blogs
+ Add Beyond Branding to your Blogroll
Add feedsAggregated blogs
Old Beyond Branding blog entries
Get this blog via email
Beyond Branding bloggers