Beyond Branding

   
Home page
The book
The authors
Updates
Pre-order
Contact us
Beyond Branding is written by members of The Medinge Group

The Beyond Branding blog


August 02, 2005

Cellphones are evil 

I still can’t see the point of s. I honestly can’t. I run a global business in 11 countries without one. The only reason for a man owning a cellphone is saving money on a vasectomy. Shove a Nokia down your pants and have your testicles irradiated.
   And text messaging? What the hell is that? The equivalent would be, ‘Hey, buy this Ford Focus, for $3,000,000.’ That’s the level of rip-off that users are experiencing. Morse Code is only slightly less primitive, but not much more.
   Cameras on cellphones? Why? Can anyone actually make out what the heck the photos are of?
   The human race is not progressing technologically, and the cellphone and the iPod are perfect examples of humanity’s retrograde. They both offer a service that is poorer, albeit more portable, than existing technologies.
   It’s amazing to see so-called cutting-edge research that takes you back to the 1950s—or before.
   Next innovation that comes along, really ask yourself: do I need this piece of crap, or is my life all right without it? Is this item really better than what is currently on offer? By accepting plain junk—the pet rock, slime, the Tamagotchi, cellphones, iPods—companies are not forced to innovate, and stagnates. Can the companies provide a camera inside a cellphone that is actually good? Yes, but while we accept low-grade junk, what incentive is there? Can the companies provide text messaging for free? Yes, but why should they?
permalink
Comments:
Primarily, Jack, my answer to 'why cellphones?' is that the most effective communication is person to person, not from place to place. I don't want to call your office from my office, I want to call *you*. And why do we put up with text messaging (sure, I'm biased: http://www.runthered.com), because it is convenient. My mobile is always on - I use it as my alarm clock. So colleagues in San Francisco, New York and London can, and do, text me to keep in touch. Why? Because I'm not always in front of a PC, or at a desk, or walking past a phone booth. And as for innovation, well we've found that all those people who don't know whether they can afford their next round at the bar love the fact that they can quietly text their bank under the table and get back a balance statement instantly. No walking to an ATM, logging into their online bank, or waiting on hold for an IVR system. You'll come round, everyone I know generally has.  
But why would you want people to be able to reach you all the time? I can’t understand that; it’s a foreign concept to me. What about time to yourself, to collect your thoughts, to plan the next step in your life? How about meditation?
   The things go off at the wrong times, usually in socially unacceptable situations. More and more people tell me that I am wise to be cellphone-free. Cities like San Francisco ban them from council meetings. I’m beginning to meet people who have abandoned their cellphones: two or three this year alone.
   Text messaging has such a mark-up on it from the telcos that I just don’t like getting ripped off: the oil companies are already doing that to me. What’s the profit margin on text for telcos? About 85 per cent? Now, I don’t use ATMs, either, and as for what an IVR system is, you’ve lost me. Is it not more convenient to call, and leave a voice mail, than tap away in a language vaguely above Morse code? (Not my example, I have to admit, but that of author Jonar Nader.) I can’t understand why text-messaging is convenient, and I see people tapping away, taking three times as long as a regular voicemail. I organize my life, so if colleagues want to reach me, I get their emails in the morning—since I get 3,000 emails a week, I would hate for those to start going to a cellphone at all hours of the day.
   I can’t imagine going to a bar if I wasn’t sure whether I could afford it; if my income was on such tenterhooks it would be a wiser decision not to go out. The example you give is valid for some, I’m sure, but again it is totally foreign as a concept to me.
   Sorry, no sale here. I totally respect what you do, Jon, and I believe you are among the top 5 per cent at it. I admire that you work in this field and are making something out of it. And from where you are, you are right to defend its usage: I would be surprised if you did not believe in the cellular world, otherwise your products wouldn’t be so good.
   To suggest I’ll ‘come round’ suggests there’s something wrong with me. Mate, it is not for me, it so far has not been in 18 years of business, and probably never will be. I stick by my post that we are not advancing technologically, and that we are being asked to put up with inferior technologies because not enough of us ask: do I need this? If we seriously asked ourselves this, life might be a lot less stressful.  
Post a Comment
Links to this post

Links to this post:

Create a Link

 

Authors’ and associates’ individual blogs

  • Johnnie Moore’s Weblog
  • Steal This Brand
  • Jack Yan: The Persuader Blog
  • Right Side up
  • Chris Lawer
  • Ton Zijlstra
  • Headshift
  • Partum Intelligendo
  • Goiaba Brazilian Music
  • Detective Marketing
  • Chris Macrae

  • + Add Beyond Branding to your Blogroll

    Add feeds

    Aggregated blogs

    RSS
    WML/WAP

    Old Beyond Branding blog entries


    Add feed to Bloglines
    Add feed to Newsgator
    Add feed to My Yahoo!


    RSS feed from 2RSS
    CompleteRSS

    This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

    Get this blog via email

    Enter your email

    Powered by FeedBlitz

    Blogroll

    Previous posts

  • To SAIC: look, sunshine, war’s over, you lost
  • Hokonui 1, Wellington 0
  • Little extras from yours truly
  • Think first, open mouth second
  • We see what we want to see
  • Nanjing buys MG Rover for £60 million
  • MG Rover needn’t stay British
  • Holden’s run of good luck may be over
  • You can in a Nissan, you can’t in a Trabant
  • The five categories of bloggers
  • Beyond Branding bloggers

    Chris Lawer UK
    Chris Macrae UK/US
    Jack Yan New Zealand
    John Caswell UK
    Johnnie Moore UK
    Malcolm Allan UK
    Nicholas Ind Norway
    Simon Anholt UK
    Stanley Moss USA
    Thomas Gad Sweden
    Tim Kitchin UK


    Blogarama

    Webfeed (RSS/ATOM/RDF) registered at http://www.feeds4all.nl


    Listed on BlogShares
    Top of the British Blogs
    Blog Flux Directory

    Business Blog Top Sites


    Feed Digest
    nfeeds.com