|
November 01, 2005 Google Ads and their effectiveness
I came across this on Johnnie Moore’s blog, citing AdPulp:
This year, Google will sell $6.1 billion in ads, nearly double what it sold last year, according to Anthony Noto, an analyst at Goldman Sachs. That is more advertising than is sold by any newspaper chain, magazine publisher or television network. I am a huge Google fan. I am one of those who believe that Larry and Sergey can do no wrong. But I wonder about the strength of the small Google ads. Some of my online properties host them, so we make a few bob off them. But are their clickthroughs strong? I hardly click on them myself, so I wonder whether I am in a minority. What I do like is that they take web ads away from the ‘Let’s make these look like print ads’ mentality. But let us not underestimate the power of the visual in brand-building. If clickthroughs are low, then they had better be good brand builders, complementing the other efforts companies do. The same-again appearance doesn’t really work for me. Is there a compromise? I wonder. Something that has the colours or the appearance of the advertiser’s visuals, but the contextual nature of Google Ads. permalink Comments:
Links to this post
Changing the color of the ads would be problematic, considering Google's stated intention of clearly differentiating between paid and "organic" content. That's why paid ads don't get mixed in with the organic listings on Google's results pages.
However, when it comes to AdSense (the ads that appear on content sites rather than search engine results), Google allows the site owner to make many changes to the look of the ads, and actually recommends using colors that make the ads blend in with the page's design. You're still required to keep the "Ads by Gooooooooogle" note visible, but they're clearly allowing site owners to blur the lines between content and advertising a bit. Regarding branding, pay-per-click ads can serve that function whether they're clicked or not. That's why it's not uncommon to see a given site showing up in both the organic and paid sections of the same results page. The ad isn't there because the site owner failed to notice that they were ranking well for the keyword phrase; they're just getting their name onto the page as much as they can, with the understanding that most users are more likely to click the organic listing than the ad, so they're not likely to go broke on those ads.
Thank you, Qwerty: very interesting to learn this viewpoint and to understand some of Google’s rationale behind the ads.
Post a Comment
Links to this post: |
Authors and associates individual blogs+ Add Beyond Branding to your Blogroll Add feedsAggregated blogsRSS WML/WAP Old Beyond Branding blog entries
|
||||||||||||||
|