|
November 03, 2005 How to save GM’s brands
It’s clear that GM in the US needs a lot more platform-sharing. It’s totally possible—one idea would be to eliminate the Saturn and Pontiac brands. Saturn has become just another Chevy inside GM; and with Chevrolet doing performance versions of its cars, Pontiac becomes irrelevant.
An alternative, since it can be argued that each brand has its niche, is to use many of GM’s foreign companies—Opel, Holden, Chevrolet do Brasil—as suppliers. Daewoo is already selling three lines of cars (Aveo, Optra, Evanda) through Chevrolet in Canada, so why not replace the Pontiac sedans with a full line of Holden’s VE Commodore; and have Opel and Chevrolet do Brasil supply import-favouring Saturn buyers with Corsa, Meriva, Astra and Vectra? Federalizing these cars will be cheaper, and all that prevents this from happening is GM’s internal political fear of having foreign products infiltrate regular proceedings. The evidence is clear: the Japanese are doing this better—Toyotas, Hondas and Nissans developed outside Japan are fed in to the domestic market—and they are leveraging their costs. Pension plans aside, the failure for GM to leverage foreign units has led to its current financial woes. Why have them, if you aren’t using them? And why not use them, when the alternative is closing down entire GM brands and firing even more GM people? permalink Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post
Links to this post: |
Authors and associates individual blogs+ Add Beyond Branding to your Blogroll Add feedsAggregated blogsRSS WML/WAP Old Beyond Branding blog entries
|
||||||||||||||
|